[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhgGPE_5urw2izAA@makrotopia.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:48:12 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: richard@....at, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, ben.hutchings@...d.be,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ubi: ubi_init: Fix missed ubiblock cleanup in
error handling path
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:19:01AM +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> The ubiblock_init called by ubi_init will register device number, but
> device number is not released in error handling path of ubi_init when
> ubi is loaded by inserting module (eg. attaching failure), which leads
> to subsequent ubi_init calls failed by running out of device number
> (dmesg shows that "__register_blkdev: failed to get major for ubiblock").
> Since ubiblock_init() registers notifier and invokes notification
> functions, so we can move it after ubi_init_attach() to fix the problem.
>
> Fixes: 927c145208b0 ("mtd: ubi: attach from device tree")
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> index 7f95fd7968a8..bc63fbf5e947 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c
> @@ -1263,9 +1263,21 @@ static struct mtd_notifier ubi_mtd_notifier = {
> .remove = ubi_notify_remove,
> };
>
> +static void detach_mtd_devs(int count)
Missing __init to avoid section missmatch.
See also: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404112327.158HJfAw-lkp@intel.com/
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + if (ubi_devices[i]) {
> + mutex_lock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> + ubi_detach_mtd_dev(ubi_devices[i]->ubi_num, 1);
> + mutex_unlock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int __init ubi_init_attach(void)
> {
> - int err, i, k;
> + int err, i;
>
> /* Attach MTD devices */
> for (i = 0; i < mtd_devs; i++) {
> @@ -1317,12 +1329,7 @@ static int __init ubi_init_attach(void)
> return 0;
>
> out_detach:
> - for (k = 0; k < i; k++)
> - if (ubi_devices[k]) {
> - mutex_lock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> - ubi_detach_mtd_dev(ubi_devices[k]->ubi_num, 1);
> - mutex_unlock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> - }
> + detach_mtd_devs(i);
> return err;
> }
> #ifndef CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE
> @@ -1366,15 +1373,6 @@ static int __init ubi_init(void)
> if (err)
> goto out_slab;
>
> - err = ubiblock_init();
> - if (err) {
> - pr_err("UBI error: block: cannot initialize, error %d\n", err);
> -
> - /* See comment above re-ubi_is_module(). */
> - if (ubi_is_module())
> - goto out_debugfs;
> - }
> -
> register_mtd_user(&ubi_mtd_notifier);
>
> if (ubi_is_module()) {
> @@ -1383,11 +1381,21 @@ static int __init ubi_init(void)
> goto out_mtd_notifier;
> }
>
> + err = ubiblock_init();
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("UBI error: block: cannot initialize, error %d\n", err);
> +
> + /* See comment above re-ubi_is_module(). */
> + if (ubi_is_module())
> + goto out_detach;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> +out_detach:
> + detach_mtd_devs(mtd_devs);
> out_mtd_notifier:
> unregister_mtd_user(&ubi_mtd_notifier);
> -out_debugfs:
> ubi_debugfs_exit();
> out_slab:
> kmem_cache_destroy(ubi_wl_entry_slab);
> @@ -1403,17 +1411,10 @@ device_initcall(ubi_init);
>
> static void __exit ubi_exit(void)
> {
> - int i;
> -
> ubiblock_exit();
> unregister_mtd_user(&ubi_mtd_notifier);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < UBI_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
> - if (ubi_devices[i]) {
> - mutex_lock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> - ubi_detach_mtd_dev(ubi_devices[i]->ubi_num, 1);
> - mutex_unlock(&ubi_devices_mutex);
> - }
> + detach_mtd_devs(UBI_MAX_DEVICES);
> ubi_debugfs_exit();
> kmem_cache_destroy(ubi_wl_entry_slab);
> misc_deregister(&ubi_ctrl_cdev);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists