linux-kernel - Re: 6.8 SPI Chip Select Regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZhgJoJQcQFSx+dti@colin-ia-desktop>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:02:40 -0500
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 6.8 SPI Chip Select Regression

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:24:54AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> You have
> addr cell = 1
> sz cell = 0
> 
> At the same time you have 
> reg <0 0>
> 
> AFAICT the SPI core behaves correctly. Am I wrong?
> 
> I.o.w. you either want to have reg = <0>, or <0 1> or something which has
> different values.

This email was snagged by my junk filter, so I just saw it.

Indeed, changing to reg = <0> solved the issue. Many, many thanks!

> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>