[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKud622jAHZGiYed-2veynA6rd_=1mnTwnTT1WNQ6203q6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:05:38 +0000
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
morbo@...gle.com, justinstitt@...gle.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com,
hankuan.chen@...ive.com, guoren@...nel.org, greentime.hu@...ive.com,
cleger@...osinc.com, apatel@...tanamicro.com, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, mchitale@...tanamicro.com,
dbarboza@...tanamicro.com, waylingii@...il.com, sameo@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shikemeng@...weicloud.com,
rppt@...nel.org, charlie@...osinc.com, xiao.w.wang@...el.com,
willy@...radead.org, jszhang@...nel.org, leobras@...hat.com,
songshuaishuai@...ylab.org, haxel@....de, samuel.holland@...ive.com,
namcaov@...il.com, bjorn@...osinc.com, cuiyunhui@...edance.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, falcon@...ylab.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
bhe@...hat.com, chenjiahao16@...wei.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, arnd@...db.de,
kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, boqun.feng@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/12] riscv: dynamic (zicfiss) shadow call stack support
Hi Deepak,
Thanks for the patches!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 6:12 AM Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> Adding support for dynamic shadow call stack on riscv. zicfiss ISA extn.
> enables protection for shadow stack against stray writes. This patch
> enables scs_* macros to use zicfiss shadow stack pointer (CSR_SSP) instead
> of relying on `gp`.
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_SCS implies that runtime patching is used to select
between software SCS and an alternative hardware implementation (in
arm64's case, PAC instead of hardware shadow stacks). I understand
this series is still an RFC, but I didn't see runtime patching
support. Are you planning on implementing this later?
If there's no plan to actually patch between Zicfiss and SCS at
runtime, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_SCS doesn't seem like the appropriate choice
and we might need a separate config option that still allows you to
reuse most of the software SCS code.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists