[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcb03c7d-f566-11cc-21e2-47e5c5a0776a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:00:41 -0500
From: mr.nuke.me@...il.com
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add IPQ9574 PCIe
controller
On 4/9/24 15:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 21:08, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> IPQ9574 has PCIe controllers which are almost identical to IPQ6018.
>> The only difference is that the "iface" clock is not required.
>> Document this difference along with the compatible string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> index cf9a6910b542..1915bea580d3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2
>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8074
>> - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
>> + - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>> - qcom,pcie-msm8996
>> - qcom,pcie-qcs404
>> - qcom,pcie-sdm845
>> @@ -397,6 +398,37 @@ allOf:
>> - const: axi_m_sticky # AXI Master Sticky reset
>> - const: axi_s_sticky # AXI Slave Sticky reset
>>
>
> Where do you constrain the reg?
I didn't realize that was also required -- the make checks should have
picked this up too? I might be invoking the tests incorrectly.
I should add the ipq9574 in the same list as ipq8074-gen3 and ipq6018,
correct?
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists