[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240411192317.25432-2-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:22:55 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/pvqspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg() in qspinlock_paravirt.h
Use try_cmpxchg(*ptr, &old, new) instead of
cmpxchg(*ptr, old, new) == old in qspinlock_paravirt.h
x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so
this change saves a compare after cmpxchg.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
---
v2: Correct a build error in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index 77ba80bd95f9..f5a36e67b593 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ static inline bool pv_hybrid_queued_unfair_trylock(struct qspinlock *lock)
*/
for (;;) {
int val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ u8 old = 0;
if (!(val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) &&
- (cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0)) {
+ try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->locked, &old, _Q_LOCKED_VAL)) {
lockevent_inc(pv_lock_stealing);
return true;
}
@@ -211,8 +212,9 @@ static struct qspinlock **pv_hash(struct qspinlock *lock, struct pv_node *node)
int hopcnt = 0;
for_each_hash_entry(he, offset, hash) {
+ struct qspinlock *old = NULL;
hopcnt++;
- if (!cmpxchg(&he->lock, NULL, lock)) {
+ if (try_cmpxchg(&he->lock, &old, lock)) {
WRITE_ONCE(he->node, node);
lockevent_pv_hop(hopcnt);
return &he->lock;
@@ -355,7 +357,7 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev)
static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
-
+ enum vcpu_state old = vcpu_halted;
/*
* If the vCPU is indeed halted, advance its state to match that of
* pv_wait_node(). If OTOH this fails, the vCPU was running and will
@@ -372,8 +374,7 @@ static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
* subsequent writes.
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
- if (cmpxchg_relaxed(&pn->state, vcpu_halted, vcpu_hashed)
- != vcpu_halted)
+ if (!try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&pn->state, &old, vcpu_hashed))
return;
/*
@@ -541,15 +542,14 @@ __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u8 locked)
#ifndef __pv_queued_spin_unlock
__visible __lockfunc void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
- u8 locked;
+ u8 locked = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
/*
* We must not unlock if SLOW, because in that case we must first
* unhash. Otherwise it would be possible to have multiple @lock
* entries, which would be BAD.
*/
- locked = cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
- if (likely(locked == _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
+ if (try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, &locked, 0))
return;
__pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(lock, locked);
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists