linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the riscv-dt tree with the risc-v tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-ec3820b2-2b47-4d5d-af2b-8d0f349336de@palmer-ri-x1c9a>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org, cyy@...self.name
Subject:     Re: linux-next: manual merge of the riscv-dt tree with the risc-v tree

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:49:01 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the riscv-dt tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/riscv/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
>   3b938e231b66 ("riscv: merge two if-blocks for KBUILD_IMAGE")
>
> from the risc-v tree and commit:
>
>   ef10bdf9c3e6 ("riscv: Kconfig.socs: Split ARCH_CANAAN and SOC_CANAAN_K210")
>
> from the riscv-dt tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/riscv/Makefile
> index 7c60bbe1f785,fa6c389c3986..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@@ -143,15 -133,7 +143,15 @@@ boot		:= arch/riscv/boo
>   ifeq ($(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL),y)
>   KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/xipImage
>   else
> - ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)$(CONFIG_ARCH_CANAAN),yy)
> ++ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN_K210),yy)
>  +KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/loader.bin
>  +else
>  +ifeq ($(CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT),)
>   KBUILD_IMAGE	:= $(boot)/Image.gz
>  +else
>  +KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/vmlinuz.efi
>  +endif
>  +endif
>   endif
>   
>   libs-y += arch/riscv/lib/

Thanks.  I guess I should have looked a bit closer before Acking, but 
I'm not sure this one warrants a shared tag or anything -- it's just 
some Makefile refactoring that happens to step on each other.