linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 24/41] KVM: x86/pmu: Zero out unexposed Counters/Selectors to avoid information leakage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZhhXxV3Z1UHLp1M1@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:36:05 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mizhang@...gle.com, 
	kan.liang@...el.com, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com, 
	jmattson@...gle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhiyuan.lv@...el.com, eranian@...gle.com, 
	irogers@...gle.com, samantha.alt@...el.com, like.xu.linux@...il.com, 
	chao.gao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 24/41] KVM: x86/pmu: Zero out unexposed
 Counters/Selectors to avoid information leakage

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024, Xiong Zhang wrote:
> From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
> 
> Zero out unexposed counters/selectors because even though KVM intercepts
> all accesses to unexposed PMU MSRs, it does pass through RDPMC instruction
> which allows guest to read all GP counters and fixed counters. So, zero out
> unexposed counter values which might contain critical information for the
> host.

This belongs in the previous patch, it's effectively a bug fix.  I appreciate
the push for finer granularity, but introducing a blatant bug and then immediately
fixing it goes too far.

> Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index f79bebe7093d..4b4da7f17895 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -895,11 +895,27 @@ static void intel_restore_pmu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + i, pmc->eventsel);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Zero out unexposed GP counters/selectors to avoid information leakage
> +	 * since passthrough PMU does not intercept RDPMC.

Zeroing the selectors is unnecessary.  KVM still intercepts MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL,
so just ensure the PMCs that aren't exposed the guest are globally enabled.

> +	 */
> +	for (i = pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp; i++) {
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PMC0 + i, 0);
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + i, 0);
> +	}
> +
>  	wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl);
>  	for (i = 0; i < pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i++) {
>  		pmc = &pmu->fixed_counters[i];
>  		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, pmc->counter);
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Zero out unexposed fixed counters to avoid information leakage
> +	 * since passthrough PMU does not intercept RDPMC.

I would call out that RDPMC interception is all or nothing, i.e. KVM can't
selectively intercept _some_ PMCs, and the MSR bitmaps don't apply to RDPMC.

> +	 */
> +	for (i = pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i < kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_fixed; i++)
> +		wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + i, 0);
>  }
>  
>  struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops __initdata = {
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>