linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 08/50] posix-cpu-timers: Save interval only for armed timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8734rr1rvp.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 00:00:58 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, John Stultz
 <jstultz@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Eric Biederman
 <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/50] posix-cpu-timers: Save interval only for armed
 timers

On Thu, Apr 11 2024 at 16:25, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
>
>> There is no point to return the interval for timers which have been
>> disarmed.
>>
> common_timer_get() returns/updates interval unconditionally - so
> behavior then differs.

Good catch! We really want to make this consistent.