linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 0/4] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no semi-automatic backport'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cover.1712812895.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:25:02 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	workflows@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/4] docs: stable-kernel-rules: fine-tuning and 'no semi-automatic backport'

After a recent discussion regarding "do we need a 'nobackport' tag" I
set out to create one change for stable-kernel-rules.rst.  This is now
the second patch in the series, which links to that discussion; the
other stuff is fine-tuning that happened along the way.

Ciao, Thorsten

Thorsten Leemhuis (4):
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: reduce redundancy
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: mention "no semi-automatic backport"
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: call mainline by its name and change
    example
  docs: stable-kernel-rules: remove code-labels tags

 Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 50 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)


base-commit: 3f86ed6ec0b390c033eae7f9c487a3fea268e027
-- 
2.44.0