[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8dc639c2c6d188d2ce3728573d9a53d.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 23:52:24 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay <devnull+forbidden405.outlook.com@...nel.org>, forbidden405@...look.com
Cc: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>, Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@...ndries.io>, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz Gmail <jorge.ramirez.ortiz@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] clk: hisilicon: rename hi3519 PLL registration function
Quoting Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay (2024-02-24 08:56:09)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> index ff4ca0edce06..77fa4203a428 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops hisi_clk_pll_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = clk_pll_recalc_rate,
> };
>
> -static void hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
> +static void _hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
Prefix it with hi3559a then to be SoC specific please. But this is also
static so I'm not sure why this patch is needed at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists