[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SEZPR06MB6959E563B692827A3E5152DD96052@SEZPR06MB6959.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:44:33 +0800
From: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay <devnull+forbidden405.outlook.com@...nel.org>
Cc: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>, Igor Opaniuk
<igor.opaniuk@...ndries.io>,
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz Gmail <jorge.ramirez.ortiz@...il.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] clk: hisilicon: rename hi3519 PLL registration
function
On 4/11/2024 2:52 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay (2024-02-24 08:56:09)
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
>> index ff4ca0edce06..77fa4203a428 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/hisilicon/clk-hi3559a.c
>> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops hisi_clk_pll_ops = {
>> .recalc_rate = clk_pll_recalc_rate,
>> };
>>
>> -static void hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
>> +static void _hisi_clk_register_pll(struct hi3559av100_pll_clock *clks,
> Prefix it with hi3559a then to be SoC specific please. But this is also
> static so I'm not sure why this patch is needed at all.
it includes the header that marks this function non-static. Also the
prototype is incompatible.
--
Regards,
Yang Xiwen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists