[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc274220-cb6e-43be-aa76-69e37449e535@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:45:50 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: wintera@...ux.ibm.com, twinkler@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with
loopback-ism
On 2024/4/3 19:10, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 14:35 +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/3/24 21:55, Wen Gu wrote:
>>> This patch set acts as the second part of the new version of [1]
>>> (The first
>>> part can be referred from [2]), the updated things of this version
>>> are listed
>>> at the end.
>>
>>> Change log:
>>>
>>> RFC v5->RFC v4:
>>> - Patch #2: minor changes in description of config SMC_LO and
>>> comments.
>>> - Patch #10: minor changes in comments and
>>> if(smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy())
>>> check in smcd_cdc_msg_send().
>>> - Patch #3: change smc_lo_generate_id() to smc_lo_generate_ids()
>>> and SMC_LO_CHID
>>> to SMC_LO_RESERVED_CHID.
>>> - Patch #5: memcpy while holding the ldev->dmb_ht_lock.
>>> - Some expression changes in commit logs.
>>>
>>
>> Hi, Jan. Do you have any comments on this version and should I post a
>> new patch series without 'RFC'? Thank you.
>
> Hi Wen,
>
> Jan has been out sick for a little while now, and Wenjia is expected
> back from a longer vacation tomorrow. So if you could hold off until
> begin of next week, Wenjia might have some more feedback.
>
> In the meantime, I'm looking at your patchset...
>
> Thank you, Gerd
>
Hi Gerd, is there any further information? I am wondering if I
should wait for more feedback from SMC maintainers. Thanks!
Hi Wenjia, when it's convenient for you, could you please confirm
if [1] and [2] need to be included in the next version? Thanks!
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7291dd1b2d16fd9bbd90988ac5bcc3a46d17e3f4.camel@linux.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60b4aec0b4bf4474d651b653c86c280dafc4518a.camel@linux.ibm.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists