linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] mptcp: add last time fields in mptcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:17:39 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
 Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] mptcp: add last time fields in mptcp_info

Hi Jakub,

On 10/04/2024 23:01, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:31:13 +0200 (GMT+02:00) Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>>> Hi Mat, is this causing skips in selftests by any chance?
>>>
>>> # 07 ....chk last_data_sent                            [SKIP] Feature probably not supported
>>> # 08 ....chk last_data_recv                            [SKIP] Feature probably not supported
>>> # 09 ....chk last_ack_recv                             [SKIP] Feature probably not supported  
>>
>> Yes it does, I should have added a note about that, sorry: that's because
>> SS needs to be patched as well to display the new counters.
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/fd9e850f1e00691204f1dfebc63c01c6a4318c10.1711705327.git.geliang@kernel.org/
>>
>> This patch will be sent when the kernel one will be accepted.
> 
> I see, applied locally now, thanks!

Thank you!

>> Is it an issue? The modification of the selftests can be applied later
>> if you prefer.
> 
> Not sure. If it doesn't happen super often maybe co-post the iproute2
> patch as described:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#co-posting-changes-to-user-space-components
> and I'll apply it on the worker machines manually.

I missed that. Indeed, that should be rare. We will do that next time!

>> Earlier today, I was looking at changing NIPA not to mark the whole
>> selftest as "SKIP" but I saw it was not a bug: a check is there to
>> mark everything as skipped if one subtest is marked as skipped
>> from what I understood. So I guess we don't want to change that :)
> 
> Correct :) It's working as intended :)

It can maybe be modified when we can re-use the option to parse embedded
TAP results :)

>>> I'll "hide it" from patchwork for now..
>>> --
>>> pw-bot: defer  
>>
>> Thank you! Do you prefer if I resend only patch 1/2 for now?
> 
> No need, restored the patches back, let's see if next run is clean.

Thank you! It looks like they are OK now!

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.