linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: correct VIB_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpobbdUcpvycYYSWaJBmkywhUrPgo=N814ZipBEL9Z_azA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:56:05 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: correct VIB_MAX_LEVELS calculation

On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
<devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>
> The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> off-by-one-step. Correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Fixes tag?

>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> index 04cb87efd799..89f0f1c810d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
>
>  #define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV       (3100)
>  #define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV       (1200)
> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV        (100)
> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
>
>  #define MAX_FF_SPEED           0xff
>
> @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>                 vib->active = true;
>                 vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
>                                                 VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
> -               vib->level /= 100;
> +               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>         } else {
>                 vib->active = false;
> -               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>         }
>
>         pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry