[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52f3abd2-4f75-4147-bc7b-c98960d9494b@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:02:52 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
<mike.leach@...aro.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/12] perf/core: Add ability for an event to "pause"
or "resume" AUX area tracing
On 8/02/24 13:31, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Hardware traces, such as instruction traces, can produce a vast amount of
> trace data, so being able to reduce tracing to more specific circumstances
> can be useful.
>
> The ability to pause or resume tracing when another event happens, can do
> that.
>
> These patches add such a facilty and show how it would work for Intel
> Processor Trace.
>
> Maintainers of other AUX area tracing implementations are requested to
> consider if this is something they might employ and then whether or not
> the ABI would work for them. Note, thank you to James Clark (ARM) for
> evaluating the API for Coresight. Suzuki K Poulose (ARM) also responded
> positively to the RFC.
>
> Changes to perf tools are now (since V4) fleshed out.
>
>
> Changes in V5:
>
> perf/core: Add aux_pause, aux_resume, aux_start_paused
> Added James' Ack
>
> perf/x86/intel: Do not enable large PEBS for events with aux actions or aux sampling
> New patch
>
> perf tools
> Added Ian's Ack
>
> Changes in V4:
>
> perf/core: Add aux_pause, aux_resume, aux_start_paused
> Rename aux_output_cfg -> aux_action
> Reorder aux_action bits from:
> aux_pause, aux_resume, aux_start_paused
> to:
> aux_start_paused, aux_pause, aux_resume
> Fix aux_action bits __u64 -> __u32
>
> coresight: Have a stab at support for pause / resume
> Dropped
>
> perf tools
> All new patches
>
> Changes in RFC V3:
>
> coresight: Have a stab at support for pause / resume
> 'mode' -> 'flags' so it at least compiles
>
> Changes in RFC V2:
>
> Use ->stop() / ->start() instead of ->pause_resume()
> Move aux_start_paused bit into aux_output_cfg
> Tighten up when Intel PT pause / resume is allowed
> Add an example of how it might work for CoreSight
Any more comments?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists