[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhfTrHrdq58LrZDs@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:12:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] mfd: kempld: A few cleanups
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:49:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > Just a set of ad-hoc cleanups. No functional change intended.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments?
> > > >
> > > > (I assume the 6+ weeks in the mailing list is enough for all kind of CIs
> > > > to complain. But they hadn't AFAICS.)
> > >
> > > Not sure why these were dropped from my queue.
> > >
> > > Likely another Mutt "feature".
> >
> > Hmm... Using mutt as well, but probably not in advanced way.
>
> I use:
>
> I flag-message toggle a message's 'important' flag
>
> ... to mark messages as requiring review.
I don't (yet?).
> Sometimes Mutt drops them for seemingly no reason. It's also not
> uncommon for me to fetch new mail or open Mutt to find 300 unread mails
> which I've already parsed. When that happens, all of the mails that
> I've previously flagged have also been (not so) helpfully unflagged!
>
> It's just something that I've grown accustomed to.
Okay, thanks for sharing your experience.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists