[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV6W613FESO6EGTTJWoG=dfCbicyH49dywm-5O09SEi0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:12:59 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] openrisc: Add support for more module relocations
Hi Stafford,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:52 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch adds the relocations. Note, we use the old naming R_OR32_*
> instead or the new naming R_OR1K_* to avoid change as this header is
> exported as a user api.
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
> #define R_OR32_JUMPTARG 6
> #define R_OR32_VTINHERIT 7
> #define R_OR32_VTENTRY 8
> +#define R_OR32_AHI16 35
> +#define R_OR32_SLO16 39
Would it make sense to switch to the new names, e.g.
#define R_OR1K_NONE 0
and add definitions for backwards compatibility?
#define R_OR32_NONE R_OR1K_NONE
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists