[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZhJonzsP1GexJOy1PTx4PCTZoU1ukQrpmaNusumU2FTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:35:54 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/pvqspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg() in qspinlock_paravirt.h
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 3:24 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > - locked = cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
> > - if (likely(locked == _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
> > + if (try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->locked, &locked, 0);
> > return; ^------------ ???
>
> This doesn't appear to be a particularly well-tested patch. ;-)
Ouch, embarrassing... oh it is a generic function, conditionally compiled with
#ifndef __pv_queued_spin_lock
#endif
and x86 defines its own function ...
I concentrated on different settings of _Q_PENDING_BITS and the above
slipped through.
Thanks,
Uros.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists