linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vch7TzevZQK4CE_WSVOgUdzODkJXiv0=OuqrmDfgevV+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:37:16 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
 protocol basic support

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:01 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol
> > protocol basic support
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 3:13 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> > wrote:

..

> > > - Because "pinctrl: pinconf-generic: check error value EOPNOTSUPP" was
> > >   applied, so pinctrl-scmi.c not convert to err return value for
> > >   'pinctrl_ops->settings_get_one()'.
> >
> > Because it's there it does not mean we want it right now. I pinged Linus about
> > it again.
>
> ok, let me include the diff[1], is this ok for you?
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/DU0PR04MB941754A6D751E80840F9A79888012@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/

Yes.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko