[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <w7cenotcuudapq4zsq6mybfvaqyljgy5hez3uc3byqzdn44yi6@76yfnhg4irt6>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:23:24 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] cgroup/pids: Separate semantics of
pids.events related to pids.max
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:55:38AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> The whole series make sense to me.
Including the migration charging?
(Asking whether I should keep it stacked in v4 posting.)
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists