[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240412031208.30688-1-shuijing.li@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:11:39 +0800
From: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@...iatek.com>
To: <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<daniel@...ll.ch>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>, Shuijing Li
<shuijing.li@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mediatek: dsi: Correct calculation formula of PHY Timing
This patch correct calculation formula of PHY timing.
The spec define HS-PREPARE should be from 40ns+4*UI(44ns) to
85ns+6*UI(91ns). But current duration is 88ns and is near the boundary.
So this patch make the duration to 64ns so it is near the safe range.
Signed-off-by: Shuijing Li <shuijing.li@...iatek.com>
---
Changes in v2:
Add a commit to describe the improvements to this patch in detail,
per suggestion frome previous thread:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20240315072945.19502-1-shuijing.li@mediatek.com/
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index a2fdfc8ddb15..d1bd7d671880 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -235,22 +235,23 @@ static void mtk_dsi_phy_timconfig(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
u32 data_rate_mhz = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsi->data_rate, 1000000);
struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
- timing->lpx = (60 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
- timing->da_hs_prepare = (80 * data_rate_mhz + 4 * 1000) / 8000;
- timing->da_hs_zero = (170 * data_rate_mhz + 10 * 1000) / 8000 + 1 -
- timing->da_hs_prepare;
- timing->da_hs_trail = timing->da_hs_prepare + 1;
-
- timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx - 2;
- timing->ta_sure = timing->lpx + 2;
- timing->ta_get = 4 * timing->lpx;
- timing->da_hs_exit = 2 * timing->lpx + 1;
-
- timing->clk_hs_prepare = 70 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000);
- timing->clk_hs_post = timing->clk_hs_prepare + 8;
- timing->clk_hs_trail = timing->clk_hs_prepare;
- timing->clk_hs_zero = timing->clk_hs_trail * 4;
- timing->clk_hs_exit = 2 * timing->clk_hs_trail;
+ timing->lpx = (80 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
+ timing->da_hs_prepare = (59 * data_rate_mhz + 4 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
+ timing->da_hs_zero = (163 * data_rate_mhz + 11 * 1000) / 8000 + 1 -
+ timing->da_hs_prepare;
+ timing->da_hs_trail = (78 * data_rate_mhz + 7 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
+
+ timing->ta_go = 4 * timing->lpx;
+ timing->ta_sure = 3 * timing->lpx / 2;
+ timing->ta_get = 5 * timing->lpx;
+ timing->da_hs_exit = (118 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
+
+ timing->clk_hs_prepare = (57 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
+ timing->clk_hs_post = (65 * data_rate_mhz + 53 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
+ timing->clk_hs_trail = (78 * data_rate_mhz + 7 * 1000) / 8000 + 1;
+ timing->clk_hs_zero = (330 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1 -
+ timing->clk_hs_prepare;
+ timing->clk_hs_exit = (118 * data_rate_mhz / (8 * 1000)) + 1;
timcon0 = timing->lpx | timing->da_hs_prepare << 8 |
timing->da_hs_zero << 16 | timing->da_hs_trail << 24;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists