lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:47:15 +0100
From: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, suleiman@...gle.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
	Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...gle.com>,
	Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
	Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ring-buffer: Allow mapped field to be set
 without mapping

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:25:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> In preparation for having the ring buffer mapped to a dedicated location,
> which will have the same restrictions as user space memory mapped buffers,
> allow it to use the "mapped" field of the ring_buffer_per_cpu structure
> without having the user space meta page mapping.
> 
> When this starts using the mapped field, it will need to handle adding a
> user space mapping (and removing it) from a ring buffer that is using a
> dedicated memory range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 793ecc454039..44b1d5f1a99a 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -5223,6 +5223,9 @@ static void rb_update_meta_page(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
>  {
>  	struct trace_buffer_meta *meta = cpu_buffer->meta_page;
>  
> +	if (!meta)
> +		return;
> +
>  	meta->reader.read = cpu_buffer->reader_page->read;
>  	meta->reader.id = cpu_buffer->reader_page->id;
>  	meta->reader.lost_events = cpu_buffer->lost_events;
> @@ -6167,7 +6170,7 @@ rb_get_mapped_buffer(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
>  
> -	if (!cpu_buffer->mapped) {
> +	if (!cpu_buffer->mapped || !cpu_buffer->meta_page) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock);
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  	}
> @@ -6345,12 +6348,13 @@ int ring_buffer_map(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,

IIUC, we still allow to map from user-space this buffer. So we now can have
mapped && !meta_page.

Then the "if (cpu_buffer->mapped) {" that skips the meta_page creation in
ring_buffer_map() should be replaced by if (cpu_buffer->meta_page).

>  	 */
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>  	rb_setup_ids_meta_page(cpu_buffer, subbuf_ids);
> +
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>  
>  	err = __rb_map_vma(cpu_buffer, vma);
>  	if (!err) {
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
> -		cpu_buffer->mapped = 1;
> +		cpu_buffer->mapped++;
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>  	} else {
>  		kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids);
> @@ -6388,7 +6392,7 @@ int ring_buffer_unmap(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
>  	mutex_lock(&buffer->mutex);
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);

In this function, there's also a check for cpu_buffer->mapped > 1. This avoids
killing the meta-page while someone is still in use.

It seems like a dedicated meta_page counter will be necessary. Otherwise, in the
event of a ring-buffer mapped at boot we, would setup the meta-page on the first
mmap() and never tear it down.

>  
> -	cpu_buffer->mapped = 0;
> +	cpu_buffer->mapped--;
>  
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ