lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:21:16 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: correct VIB_MAX_LEVELS calculation

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 15:36, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
<devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>
> The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> off-by-one-step. Correct it.

.. while we are at it also add a define for the step size instead of
using the magic value.

With that in place:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

>
> Fixes: 11205bb63e5c ("Input: add support for pm8xxx based vibrator driver")
> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> index 04cb87efd799..844ca7e1f59f 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
>
>  #define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV       (3100)
>  #define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV       (1200)
> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV                (100)
> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
>
>  #define MAX_FF_SPEED           0xff
>
> @@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>                 vib->active = true;
>                 vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
>                                                 VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
> -               vib->level /= 100;
> +               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>         } else {
>                 vib->active = false;
> -               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>         }
>
>         pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ