[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cl5fmton3n5ayzr7ondnw7lzjaxoppyqhnoervj2fn4et75ish@cyko4abxbslg>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:03:01 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make dev_err_probe() silent for -ENOMEM
Hello Andy,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:51:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > For an out-of-memory error there should be no additional output. Adapt
> > dev_err_probe() to not emit the error message when err is -ENOMEM.
> > This simplifies handling errors that might among others be -ENOMEM.
>
> ...
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(err == -ENOMEM);
>
> Done!
Well no, that doesn't do the trick. Consider for example device_add().
That function can return (at least) -EINVAL and -ENOMEM. To properly
ensure that the error handling is silent with the current
dev_err_probe(), we'd need to do:
ret = device_add(...);
if (ret) {
if (ret != -ENOMEM)
return dev_err_probe(...);
else
return ret;
}
With my suggested patch this can be reduced to:
ret = device_add(...);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(...);
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists