[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a85997b-77a1-4c19-81d6-0e6cb59e7c5c@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:15:14 +0200
From: Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
maco@...roid.com, tglx@...utronix.de, sean.anderson@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: *** SPAM *** Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/175] 4.19.312-rc1 review
Le 12/04/2024 à 21:46, Pavel Machek a écrit :
>> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> slimbus: core: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API
> AFAICT this is just a cleanup. We should not need this.
>
Not exactly.
As stated in the commit: "this change allows one more device. Previously
address 0xFE was never used."
I don't use slimbus, so I'll let people with more knowledge than me
about this driver decide if it should be backported or not, but from my
point of view, it is a valid fix.
But, unless s.o. complained that this extra device address was needed in
a RL scenario, I would say that the patch should not be backported,
because: "better safe than sorry".
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists