lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024041245-surfboard-expenses-ba74@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:20:54 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Roman Storozhenko <romeusmeister@...il.com>
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org, Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
	javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq: Auto release device node using __free attribute


A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:28:17PM +0200, Roman Storozhenko wrote:
> This change allows us to put this pointer under automatic scope
> management and get rid of node_put.  Besides, if a new code path is
> introduced we won't need to add a new of_node_put.

We worry about future stuff then, in the future.  So no need for
changing code today for things that are not present at all, otherwise
you would never be finished with anything, right?

Don't make things more complex when it is not needed.  Only add
complexity when it is needed.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ