linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/bugs: Only harden syscalls when needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:37:42 -0700
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/bugs: Only harden syscalls when needed

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:28:54PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > +#define __do_syscall(table, func_direct, nr, regs)			\
> > +({									\
> > +	unsigned long __rax, __rdi, __rsi;				\
> > +									\
> > +	asm_inline volatile(						\
> > +		ALTERNATIVE("call " __stringify(func_direct) "\n\t",	\
> > +			    ANNOTATE_RETPOLINE_SAFE			\
> > +			    "call *%[func_ptr]\n\t",			\
> > +			    X86_FEATURE_INDIRECT_SAFE)			\
> > +		: "=D" (__rdi), "=S" (__rsi), "=a" (__rax),		\
> > +		  ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT					\
> > +		: "0" (regs), "1" (nr), [func_ptr] "r" (table[nr])	\
> > +		: "rdx", "rcx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",		\
> > +		  "cc", "memory");					\
> > +									\
> > +	__rax;								\
> > +})
> 
> This is a nice implementation, but I think we can avoid the complexity
> by using cpu_feature_enabled(). As cpu_feature_enabled() is also runtime
> patched, atleast the likely() path should be comparable to this. Please
> let me know if you have any concerns with this approach.
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 6de50b80702e..7c5332b83246 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ static __always_inline bool do_syscall_x64(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
>  
>  	if (likely(unr < NR_syscalls)) {
>  		unr = array_index_nospec(unr, NR_syscalls);
> -		regs->ax = x64_sys_call(regs, unr);
> +		if (likely(cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INDIRECT_SAFE)))
> +			regs->ax = sys_call_table[unr](regs);
> +		else
> +			regs->ax = x64_sys_call(regs, unr);

BTW, this also solves the missing lfence case before the indirect call.