[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kMZ6mpK+LaL9Xfsp032CZOfAEtr6Dp9A2R-m6dC3gkWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:58:57 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rust: time: Use wrapping_sub() for Ktime::sub()
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 9:43 AM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Is that going to remain enabled by default or what was the plan here?
The plan is to ideally keep it enabled by default, but I defer to Kees
with whom we discussed this back then (Cc'd).
The goal is that Rust code, since the beginning, has all wrapping
operations marked explicitly as such.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists