[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ja5lzovj1.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:04:22 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Neil
Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, JunYi Zhao
<junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] pwm: meson: dt-bindings fixup
On Sat 02 Mar 2024 at 16:50, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> wrote:
> On Sat 02 Mar 2024 at 11:04, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>> Hello Jerome,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:11:46PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>> Jerome Brunet (5):
>>> dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: fix s4 bindings
>>> dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: Add a new binding for meson8 pwm types
>>> pwm: meson: generalize 4 inputs clock on meson8 pwm type
>>> pwm: meson: don't carry internal clock elements around
>>> pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to sm1
>>
>> I applied patches #1 to #3. This doesn't mean #4 and #5 are bad, just
>> that I need some more time for review.
>
> No worries. The change in those, especially #5, are pretty simple but
> the diff are indeed hard to read :/
Hello Uwe,
Introducing the s4 support depends on this series.
Is there any news ?
Thanks
Regards
>
>>
>> Best regards
>> Uwe
--
Jerome
Powered by blists - more mailing lists