linux-kernel - [PATCH v6 4/7] perf/bpf: Call bpf handler directly, not through overflow machinery

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240412015019.7060-5-khuey@kylehuey.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:50:16 -0700
From: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
To: Kyle Huey <khuey@...ehuey.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/7] perf/bpf: Call bpf handler directly, not through overflow machinery

To ultimately allow bpf programs attached to perf events to completely
suppress all of the effects of a perf event overflow (rather than just the
sample output, as they do today), call bpf_overflow_handler() from
__perf_event_overflow() directly rather than modifying struct perf_event's
overflow_handler. Return the bpf program's return value from
bpf_overflow_handler() so that __perf_event_overflow() knows how to
proceed. Remove the now unnecessary orig_overflow_handler from struct
perf_event.

This patch is solely a refactoring and results in no behavior change.

Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@...ehuey.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  6 +-----
 kernel/events/core.c       | 27 +++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 07cd4722dedb..65ad1294218f 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -809,7 +809,6 @@ struct perf_event {
 	u64				(*clock)(void);
 	perf_overflow_handler_t		overflow_handler;
 	void				*overflow_handler_context;
-	perf_overflow_handler_t		orig_overflow_handler;
 	struct bpf_prog			*prog;
 	u64				bpf_cookie;
 
@@ -1355,10 +1354,7 @@ __is_default_overflow_handler(perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler)
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 static inline bool uses_default_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	if (likely(is_default_overflow_handler(event)))
-		return true;
-
-	return __is_default_overflow_handler(event->orig_overflow_handler);
+	return is_default_overflow_handler(event);
 }
 #else
 #define uses_default_overflow_handler(event) \
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index a7c2a739a27c..fd601d509cea 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9545,9 +9545,9 @@ static inline bool sample_is_allowed(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *r
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
-static void bpf_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
-				 struct perf_sample_data *data,
-				 struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int bpf_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
+				struct perf_sample_data *data,
+				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern ctx = {
 		.data = data,
@@ -9568,10 +9568,8 @@ static void bpf_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 out:
 	__this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
-	if (!ret)
-		return;
 
-	event->orig_overflow_handler(event, data, regs);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int perf_event_set_bpf_handler(struct perf_event *event,
@@ -9607,8 +9605,6 @@ static int perf_event_set_bpf_handler(struct perf_event *event,
 
 	event->prog = prog;
 	event->bpf_cookie = bpf_cookie;
-	event->orig_overflow_handler = READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler);
-	WRITE_ONCE(event->overflow_handler, bpf_overflow_handler);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -9619,15 +9615,15 @@ static void perf_event_free_bpf_handler(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (!prog)
 		return;
 
-	WRITE_ONCE(event->overflow_handler, event->orig_overflow_handler);
 	event->prog = NULL;
 	bpf_prog_put(prog);
 }
 #else
-static void bpf_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
-				 struct perf_sample_data *data,
-				 struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int bpf_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
+				struct perf_sample_data *data,
+				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int perf_event_set_bpf_handler(struct perf_event *event,
@@ -9711,7 +9707,8 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
 		irq_work_queue(&event->pending_irq);
 	}
 
-	READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, data, regs);
+	if (!(event->prog && !bpf_overflow_handler(event, data, regs)))
+		READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, data, regs);
 
 	if (*perf_event_fasync(event) && event->pending_kill) {
 		event->pending_wakeup = 1;
@@ -11978,13 +11975,11 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
 		overflow_handler = parent_event->overflow_handler;
 		context = parent_event->overflow_handler_context;
 #if defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) && defined(CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING)
-		if (overflow_handler == bpf_overflow_handler) {
+		if (parent_event->prog) {
 			struct bpf_prog *prog = parent_event->prog;
 
 			bpf_prog_inc(prog);
 			event->prog = prog;
-			event->orig_overflow_handler =
-				parent_event->orig_overflow_handler;
 		}
 #endif
 	}
-- 
2.34.1