lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_C7B10C572AA62E84ABF1818F52904DFBCA05@qq.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:59:08 +0800
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
To: ebiggers@...nel.org
Cc: andy.chiu@...ive.com,
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
	ardb@...nel.org,
	christoph.muellner@...ll.eu,
	heiko@...ech.de,
	hongrong.hsu@...ive.com,
	jerry.shih@...ive.com,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	palmer@...belt.com,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
	phoebe.chen@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] crypto: riscv - add vector crypto accelerated ChaCha20

On 2024/1/22 08:19, Eric Biggers wrote:> From: Jerry Shih <jerry.shih@...ive.com>
> 
> Add an implementation of ChaCha20 using the Zvkb extension.  The
> assembly code is derived from OpenSSL code (openssl/openssl#21923) that
> was dual-licensed so that it could be reused in the kernel.
> Nevertheless, the assembly has been significantly reworked for
> integration with the kernel, for example by using a regular .S file
> instead of the so-called perlasm, using the assembler instead of bare
> '.inst', and reducing code duplication.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerry Shih <jerry.shih@...ive.com>
> Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> ---

Hi, Jerry Shih and Eric Biggers,

Since this implementation is derived from OpenSSL, I have an issue on
OpenSSL about this chacha20 implementation using Zvkb [1] and see a fixes
PR by Jerry Shih [2].

I wonder will kernel need to port those fixes to handle the non-multiple
block length of the chacha20 cipher? If yes, we should port it immediately
to catch up with the v6.9 release if we can.

[1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/24070
[2] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24097

Thanks,
Yangyu Chen


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ