linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] mm/ksm: rename get_ksm_page_flags() to ksm_get_folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <188e492e-343e-4205-b768-132ddc5229e7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:57:25 +0800
From: Alex Shi <seakeel@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: alexs@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 zik.eidus@...ellosystems.com, willy@...radead.org, aarcange@...hat.com,
 hughd@...gle.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/10] mm/ksm: rename get_ksm_page_flags() to
 ksm_get_folio_flags



On 4/12/24 4:42 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:46:23 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 11.04.24 13:42, Alex Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/11/24 3:51 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 11.04.24 08:17, alexs@...nel.org wrote:
>>>>> From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> As we are removing get_ksm_page_flags(), make the flags match the new
>>>>> function name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> s/get_ksm_page_flags()/get_ksm_page_flags/ in title, otherwise LGTM.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Uh, for this trivial issue, do I need to sent a new version? or left to maintainer for a quick fix?
>>
>> I'm sure Andrew can fix that up :)
> 
> He indeed can.  Although he prefers foo() to foo.  Those two characters
> have a good information-per-byte ratio.
> 
> Also I added Alex's Signed-off-by to this.
> 
>         (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
>             person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
>             it.
> 

Thanks a lot for you and all the info!

Best regards!