[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKRVVNzgQk6PETfJ9RrDuzT1CTjHWW02Twc_T4C82t__Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:54:32 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] of: dynamic: Fix overlayed devices not probing
because of fw_devlink
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:56 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> When an overlay is applied, if the target device has already probed
> successfully and bound to a device, then some of the fw_devlink logic
> that ran when the device was probed needs to be rerun. This allows newly
> created dangling consumers of the overlayed device tree nodes to be
> moved to become consumers of the target device.
>
> Fixes: 1a50d9403fb9 ("treewide: Fix probing of devices in DT overlays")
> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdXEnSD4rRJ-o90x4OprUacN_rJgyo8x6=9F9rZ+-KzjOg@mail.gmail.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221095137.616d2aaa@bootlin.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240312151835.29ef62a0@bootlin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 15 +++++++++
> include/linux/fwnode.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 5f4e03336e68..1a646f393dd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static bool fw_devlink_drv_reg_done;
> static bool fw_devlink_best_effort;
> static struct workqueue_struct *device_link_wq;
>
> +#define get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode) get_device((fwnode)->dev)
I think it is better to not have this wrapper. We want it to be clear
when we're acquiring a ref. I know get_device() does that, but I have
to look up what get_dev_from_fwnode() does exactly.
Side note: I didn't know fwnode has a ptr to the struct device. I
wonder if we can kill off of_find_device_by_node() using that. That's
for platform devices though.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists