lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:10:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "M. Haener" <michael.haener@...mens.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
 Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS
 binding

On 13/04/2024 09:15, M. Haener wrote:
> From: Michael Haener <michael.haener@...mens.com>
> 

Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching.

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding". The "dt-bindings"
prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18


>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> index 3ab4434b7352..af7720dc4a12 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tpm/tcg,tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ properties:
>            - enum:
>                - infineon,slb9673
>                - nuvoton,npct75x
> +              - st,st33ktpm2xi2c

I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need
second patch? Plus binding come before users.

Please explain what are you doing in other patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ