lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6042c0c7-bb8a-4898-8bed-92155b8e9c4f@broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:55:45 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kamal Dasu
 <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>, Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
 linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
 Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Add BCM2712 SD Express support



On 4/13/2024 3:14 PM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
> Broadcom BCM2712 SDHCI controller is SD Express capable. Add support
> for sde capability where the implementation is based on downstream driver,
> diverging from it in the way that init_sd_express callback is invoked:
> in downstream the sdhci_ops structure has been augmented with a new
> function ptr 'init_sd_express' that just propagate the call to the
> driver specific callback so that the callstack from a structure
> standpoint is mmc_host_ops -> sdhci_ops. The drawback here is in the
> added level of indirection (the newly added init_sd_express is
> redundant) and the sdhci_ops structure declaration has to be changed.
> To overcome this the presented approach consist in patching the mmc_host_ops
> init_sd_express callback to point directly to the custom function defined in
> this driver (see struct brcmstb_match_priv).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig         |   1 +
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> index aebc587f77a7..343ccac1a4e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> @@ -1018,6 +1018,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_BRCMSTB
>   	depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC || COMPILE_TEST
>   	depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
>   	select MMC_CQHCI
> +	select OF_DYNAMIC
>   	default ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC
>   	help
>   	  This selects support for the SDIO/SD/MMC Host Controller on
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> index 907a4947abe5..56fb34a75ec2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>   
>   #define BRCMSTB_PRIV_FLAGS_HAS_CQE		BIT(0)
>   #define BRCMSTB_PRIV_FLAGS_GATE_CLOCK		BIT(1)
> +#define BRCMSTB_PRIV_FLAGS_HAS_SD_EXPRESS	BIT(2)
>   
>   #define SDHCI_ARASAN_CQE_BASE_ADDR		0x200
>   
> @@ -50,13 +51,19 @@ struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv {
>   	unsigned int flags;
>   	struct clk *base_clk;
>   	u32 base_freq_hz;
> +	struct regulator *sde_1v8;
> +	struct device_node *sde_pcie;
> +	void *__iomem sde_ioaddr;
> +	void *__iomem sde_ioaddr2;
>   	struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
>   	struct pinctrl_state *pins_default;
> +	struct pinctrl_state *pins_sdex;
>   };
>   
>   struct brcmstb_match_priv {
>   	void (*hs400es)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>   	void (*cfginit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> +	int (*init_sd_express)(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios);
>   	struct sdhci_ops *ops;
>   	const unsigned int flags;
>   };
> @@ -263,6 +270,105 @@ static void sdhci_brcmstb_cfginit_2712(struct sdhci_host *host)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static int bcm2712_init_sd_express(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *brcmstb_priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> +	struct device *dev = host->mmc->parent;
> +	u32 ctrl_val;
> +	u32 present_state;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr || !brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!brcmstb_priv->pinctrl)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Turn off the SD clock first */
> +	sdhci_set_clock(host, 0);
> +
> +	/* Disable SD DAT0-3 pulls */
> +	pinctrl_select_state(brcmstb_priv->pinctrl, brcmstb_priv->pins_sdex);
> +
> +	ctrl_val = readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "ctrl_val 1 %08x\n", ctrl_val);
> +
> +	/* Tri-state the SD pins */
> +	ctrl_val |= 0x1ff8;

No magic values please.

> +	writel(ctrl_val, brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "ctrl_val 1->%08x (%08x)\n", ctrl_val, readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr));
> +	/* Let voltages settle */
> +	udelay(100);

Why not usleep_range()?

> +
> +	/* Enable the PCIe sideband pins */
> +	ctrl_val &= ~0x6000;

No magic values please.

> +	writel(ctrl_val, brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "ctrl_val 1->%08x (%08x)\n", ctrl_val, readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr));
> +	/* Let voltages settle */
> +	udelay(100);

Likewise.

> +
> +	/* Turn on the 1v8 VDD2 regulator */
> +	ret = regulator_enable(brcmstb_priv->sde_1v8);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Wait for Tpvcrl */
> +	msleep(1);
> +
> +	/* Sample DAT2 (CLKREQ#) - if low, card is in PCIe mode */
> +	present_state = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE);
> +	present_state = (present_state & SDHCI_DATA_LVL_MASK) >> SDHCI_DATA_LVL_SHIFT;
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "state = 0x%08x\n", present_state);
> +
> +	if (present_state & BIT(2)) {

Likewise, replace with constant.

> +		dev_err(dev, "DAT2 still high, abandoning SDex switch\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Turn on the LCPLL PTEST mux */
> +	ctrl_val = readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2 + 20); // misc5
> +	ctrl_val &= ~(0x7 << 7);
> +	ctrl_val |= 3 << 7;
> +	writel(ctrl_val, brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2 + 20);
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "misc 5->%08x (%08x)\n", ctrl_val, readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2 + 20));
> +
> +	/* PTEST diff driver enable */
> +	ctrl_val = readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2);
> +	ctrl_val |= BIT(21);
> +	writel(ctrl_val, brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "misc 0->%08x (%08x)\n", ctrl_val, readl(brcmstb_priv->sde_ioaddr2));
> +
> +	/* Wait for more than the minimum Tpvpgl time */
> +	msleep(100);
> +
> +	if (brcmstb_priv->sde_pcie) {
> +		struct of_changeset changeset;
> +		static struct property okay_property = {
> +			.name = "status",
> +			.value = "okay",
> +			.length = 5,
> +		};
> +
> +		/* Enable the pcie controller */
> +		of_changeset_init(&changeset);
> +		ret = of_changeset_update_property(&changeset,
> +						   brcmstb_priv->sde_pcie,
> +						   &okay_property);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to update property - %d\n", __func__,
> +			       ret);
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}
> +		ret = of_changeset_apply(&changeset);
> +	}

Why are you doing this? Cannot the firmware enable/disable the node 
according to the boot mode or something else?

This is not going to fly for upstream, sorry.
-- 
Florian

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4221 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ