[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <661b2e2ef3396_3cb63829493@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 21:15:26 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] net: gro: add {inner_}network_offset to
napi_gro_cb
Richard Gobert wrote:
> This patch adds network_offset and inner_network_offset to napi_gro_cb, and
> makes sure both are set correctly. In the common path there's only one
> write (skb_gro_reset_offset).
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/geneve.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 1 +
> include/net/gro.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 2 ++
> net/core/gro.c | 1 +
> net/ethernet/eth.c | 1 +
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 5 +----
> net/ipv4/gre_offload.c | 1 +
> net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c | 8 ++++----
> 9 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c b/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c
> index d4520c3f7c09..ae596285d78c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/gre_offload.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *gre_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> /* Adjusted NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum after skb_gro_pull()*/
> skb_gro_postpull_rcsum(skb, greh, grehlen);
>
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->inner_network_offset = hlen;
> pp = call_gro_receive(ptype->callbacks.gro_receive, head, skb);
> flush = 0;
Nice that this even works for ETH_P_TEB, as eth_gro_receive will
overwrite the offset written here.
> list_for_each_entry(p, head, list) {
> const struct ipv6hdr *iph2;
> @@ -327,6 +325,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *sit_ip6ip6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> }
>
> NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->encap_mark = 1;
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->inner_network_offset = skb_gro_offset(skb);
>
> return ipv6_gro_receive(head, skb);
> }
> @@ -342,6 +341,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ip4ip6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> }
>
> NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->encap_mark = 1;
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->inner_network_offset = skb_gro_offset(skb);
Do we still need encap_mark, or is it always set at the same time that
inner_network_offset becomes non-zero?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists