[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66b11910-c6e2-401c-a293-441f6d85bb90@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:19:46 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kamal Dasu
<kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>, Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: bcm: Add pinconf/pinmux controller driver
for BCM2712
Le 14/04/2024 à 00:14, Andrea della Porta a écrit :
> Add a pincontrol driver for BCM2712. BCM2712 allows muxing GPIOs
> and setting configuration on pads.
>
> Originally-by: Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>
> Originally-by: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2712.c | 1247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 1257 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2712.c
..
> +static int bcm2712_pmx_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + unsigned selector,
> + const char * const **groups,
> + unsigned * const num_groups)
> +{
> + struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
Missing empty new line.
> + /* every pin can do every function */
> + *groups = pc->gpio_groups;
> + *num_groups = pc->pctl_desc.npins;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
> +static int bcm2712_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + unsigned pin, unsigned long *config)
> +{
> + struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> + enum pin_config_param param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
> + u32 arg;
> +
> + switch (param) {
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> + arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_NONE);
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> + arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_DOWN);
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> + arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_UP);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + *config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
> +
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
Strange.
return 0;
?
> +}
> +
> +static int bcm2712_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> + unsigned int pin, unsigned long *configs,
> + unsigned int num_configs)
> +{
> + struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> + u32 param, arg;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
> + param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
> + arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
> +
> + switch (param) {
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> + bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_NONE);
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> + bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_DOWN);
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> + bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_UP);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> + } /* for each config */
This comment is not really usefull, IMHO.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
> +static int bcm2712_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + //struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + const struct bcm_plat_data *pdata;
> + //const struct of_device_id *match;
> + struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc;
> + const char **names;
> + int num_pins, i;
> +
> + pdata = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + pc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
> + pc->dev = dev;
> + spin_lock_init(&pc->lock);
> +
> + //pc->base = devm_of_iomap(dev, np, 0, NULL);
Any use for this commented code? (and variable declarations above)
CJ
> + pc->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(pc->base))) {
> + //dev_err(dev, "could not get IO memory\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->base);
> + }
> +
> + pc->pctl_desc = *pdata->pctl_desc;
> + num_pins = pc->pctl_desc.npins;
> + names = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, num_pins, sizeof(const char *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!names)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++)
> + names[i] = pc->pctl_desc.pins[i].name;
> + pc->gpio_groups = names;
> + pc->pin_regs = pdata->pin_regs;
> + pc->pin_funcs = pdata->pin_funcs;
> + pc->pctl_dev = devm_pinctrl_register(dev, &pc->pctl_desc, pc);
> + if (IS_ERR(pc->pctl_dev))
> + return PTR_ERR(pc->pctl_dev);
> +
> + pc->gpio_range = *pdata->gpio_range;
> + pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pc->pctl_dev, &pc->gpio_range);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists