lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:19:46 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>,
 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kamal Dasu
 <kamal.dasu@...adcom.com>, Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
 linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>,
 Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: bcm: Add pinconf/pinmux controller driver
 for BCM2712

Le 14/04/2024 à 00:14, Andrea della Porta a écrit :
> Add a pincontrol driver for BCM2712. BCM2712 allows muxing GPIOs
> and setting configuration on pads.
> 
> Originally-by: Jonathan Bell <jonathan@...pberrypi.com>
> Originally-by: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@...e.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/Kconfig           |    9 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/Makefile          |    1 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2712.c | 1247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 1257 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2712.c

..

> +static int bcm2712_pmx_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +		unsigned selector,
> +		const char * const **groups,
> +		unsigned * const num_groups)
> +{
> +	struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);

Missing empty new line.

> +	/* every pin can do every function */
> +	*groups = pc->gpio_groups;
> +	*num_groups = pc->pctl_desc.npins;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

..

> +static int bcm2712_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +			unsigned pin, unsigned long *config)
> +{
> +	struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	enum pin_config_param param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
> +	u32 arg;
> +
> +	switch (param) {
> +	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> +		arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_NONE);
> +		break;
> +	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> +		arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_DOWN);
> +		break;
> +	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> +		arg = (bcm2712_pull_config_get(pc, pin) == BCM2712_PULL_UP);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	*config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
> +
> +	return -ENOTSUPP;

Strange.

	return 0;
?

> +}
> +
> +static int bcm2712_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +			       unsigned int pin, unsigned long *configs,
> +			       unsigned int num_configs)
> +{
> +	struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	u32 param, arg;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
> +		param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
> +		arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
> +
> +		switch (param) {
> +		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
> +			bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_NONE);
> +			break;
> +		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> +			bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_DOWN);
> +			break;
> +		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> +			bcm2712_pull_config_set(pc, pin, BCM2712_PULL_UP);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		}
> +	} /* for each config */

This comment is not really usefull, IMHO.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

..

> +static int bcm2712_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	//struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	const struct bcm_plat_data *pdata;
> +	//const struct of_device_id *match;
> +	struct bcm2712_pinctrl *pc;
> +	const char **names;
> +	int num_pins, i;
> +
> +	pdata = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!pdata)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	pc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
> +	pc->dev = dev;
> +	spin_lock_init(&pc->lock);
> +
> +	//pc->base = devm_of_iomap(dev, np, 0, NULL);

Any use for this commented code? (and variable declarations above)

CJ

> +	pc->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(pc->base))) {
> +		//dev_err(dev, "could not get IO memory\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(pc->base);
> +	}
> +
> +	pc->pctl_desc = *pdata->pctl_desc;
> +	num_pins = pc->pctl_desc.npins;
> +	names = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, num_pins, sizeof(const char *),
> +				   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!names)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++)
> +		names[i] = pc->pctl_desc.pins[i].name;
> +	pc->gpio_groups = names;
> +	pc->pin_regs = pdata->pin_regs;
> +	pc->pin_funcs = pdata->pin_funcs;
> +	pc->pctl_dev = devm_pinctrl_register(dev, &pc->pctl_desc, pc);
> +	if (IS_ERR(pc->pctl_dev))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pc->pctl_dev);
> +
> +	pc->gpio_range = *pdata->gpio_range;
> +	pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pc->pctl_dev, &pc->gpio_range);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

..


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ