[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ntsifcsfo5i6xisxbgfjdpe4uenygqxrt3v5sceflgipznw6cb@gnhvkjmglrtg>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:54:57 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>
To: kde@...ewolf.com
Cc: lains@...eup.net, hadess@...ess.net, jikos@...nel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@...io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Logitech Anywhere 3SB support
[Ccing Hans as well for input]
On Apr 13 2024, kde@...ewolf.com wrote:
> From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <allan.jensen@...io>
>
FWIW, this patch neesd a commit description and signed-offs
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 1 +
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c | 10 +++++++++-
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> index 2235d78784b1..4b79c4578d32 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> @@ -849,6 +849,7 @@
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_NANO_RECEIVER_LIGHTSPEED_1 0xc539
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_NANO_RECEIVER_LIGHTSPEED_1_1 0xc53f
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_NANO_RECEIVER_POWERPLAY 0xc53a
> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_BOLT_RECEIVER 0xc548
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_SPACETRAVELLER 0xc623
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_SPACENAVIGATOR 0xc626
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_DINOVO_DESKTOP 0xc704
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> index c358778e070b..92b41ae5a47c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ enum recvr_type {
> recvr_type_27mhz,
> recvr_type_bluetooth,
> recvr_type_dinovo,
> + recvr_type_bolt,
I am *really* hesitant in integrating the bolt receiver into
logitech-dj.ko:
- the bolt receiver is not capable of making the distinction between the
source of the events (so only one mouse/keyboard can be used at the
time)
- we still have a couple of outstanding and impossible to debug issues
with some high resolution mice connected over the unifying receiver,
and adding one more receiver makes me nervous
- I have a strong feeling by reading the code that the keyboard part
will fail (there is a comment "For the keyboard, we can reuse the same
report by using the second byte which is constant in the USB HID
report descriptor." though I can't seem to find this constant report
on the bolt receiver)
- what are the benefits of adding it?
- will it break fwupd?
> };
>
> struct dj_report {
> @@ -1068,6 +1069,7 @@ static void logi_hidpp_recv_queue_notif(struct hid_device *hdev,
> workitem.reports_supported |= STD_KEYBOARD;
> break;
> case 0x0f:
> + case 0x10:
> case 0x11:
> device_type = "eQUAD Lightspeed 1.2";
> logi_hidpp_dev_conn_notif_equad(hdev, hidpp_report, &workitem);
> @@ -1430,7 +1432,8 @@ static int logi_dj_ll_parse(struct hid_device *hid)
> dbg_hid("%s: sending a mouse descriptor, reports_supported: %llx\n",
> __func__, djdev->reports_supported);
> if (djdev->dj_receiver_dev->type == recvr_type_gaming_hidpp ||
> - djdev->dj_receiver_dev->type == recvr_type_mouse_only)
> + djdev->dj_receiver_dev->type == recvr_type_mouse_only ||
> + djdev->dj_receiver_dev->type == recvr_type_bolt)
> rdcat(rdesc, &rsize, mse_high_res_descriptor,
> sizeof(mse_high_res_descriptor));
> else if (djdev->dj_receiver_dev->type == recvr_type_27mhz)
> @@ -1773,6 +1776,7 @@ static int logi_dj_probe(struct hid_device *hdev,
> case recvr_type_dj: no_dj_interfaces = 3; break;
> case recvr_type_hidpp: no_dj_interfaces = 2; break;
> case recvr_type_gaming_hidpp: no_dj_interfaces = 3; break;
> + case recvr_type_bolt: no_dj_interfaces = 4; break;
4? The device I have here only has 3 (unless I misremember how this is
supposed to be working).
> case recvr_type_mouse_only: no_dj_interfaces = 2; break;
> case recvr_type_27mhz: no_dj_interfaces = 2; break;
> case recvr_type_bluetooth: no_dj_interfaces = 2; break;
> @@ -1950,6 +1954,10 @@ static const struct hid_device_id logi_dj_receivers[] = {
> HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
> USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_UNIFYING_RECEIVER_2),
> .driver_data = recvr_type_dj},
> + { /* Logitech bolt receiver (0xc548) */
> + HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
> + USB_DEVICE_ID_LOGITECH_BOLT_RECEIVER),
> + .driver_data = recvr_type_bolt},
>
> { /* Logitech Nano mouse only receiver (0xc52f) */
> HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH,
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 3c00e6ac8e76..509142982daa 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -4380,6 +4380,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hidpp_devices[] = {
> HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xb023) },
> { /* MX Master 3S mouse over Bluetooth */
> HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xb034) },
> + { /* MX Anywhere 3SB mouse over Bluetooth */
> + HID_BLUETOOTH_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xb038) },
That I can accept, however know that there is a regression in bluez
0.73[0] (but it should be fixed in 0.74)
Cheers,
Benjamin
[0] https://github.com/bluez/bluez/issues/778#issuecomment-2048870358
> {}
> };
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists