[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240415161409.8375-1-jain.abhinav177@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:14:09 +0000
From: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@...il.com>
To: keescook@...omium.org,
tony.luck@...el.com,
gpiccoli@...lia.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com,
Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] pstore/ram: Replace of_node_put with __free() for automatic cleanup
Add __free(device_node) to the parent_node struct declaration.
Move declaration to initialization for ensuring scope sanity.
Remove of_node_put from parent_node struct.
Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Jain <jain.abhinav177@...il.com>
---
fs/pstore/ram.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
index b1a455f42e93..14f2f4864e48 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
@@ -644,7 +644,6 @@ static int ramoops_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct ramoops_platform_data *pdata)
{
struct device_node *of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- struct device_node *parent_node;
struct resource *res;
u32 value;
int ret;
@@ -704,14 +703,13 @@ static int ramoops_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
* we're not a child of "reserved-memory" and mimicking the
* expected behavior.
*/
- parent_node = of_get_parent(of_node);
+ struct device_node *parent_node __free(device_node) = of_node_parent(of_node);
if (!of_node_name_eq(parent_node, "reserved-memory") &&
!pdata->console_size && !pdata->ftrace_size &&
!pdata->pmsg_size && !pdata->ecc_info.ecc_size) {
pdata->console_size = pdata->record_size;
pdata->pmsg_size = pdata->record_size;
}
- of_node_put(parent_node);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists