[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240415-uncooked-gently-22743a504b30@spud>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:53:52 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Houlong Wei (魏厚龙) <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Sung (宋孝謙) <Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>,
CK Hu (胡俊光) <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add mboxes property for
CMDQ secure driver
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:00:53AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 18:52 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 04:15:51PM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 17:13 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 15:52 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 04:31:06AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Conor,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the reviews.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 16:46 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 06:25:54PM +0800, Shawn Sung
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > > > > > > > > + mediatek,gce-events:
> > > > > > > > > + description:
> > > > > > > > > + The event id which is mapping to the specific
> > > > > > > > > hardware
> > > > > > > > > event
> > > > > > > > > signal
> > > > > > > > > + to gce. The event id is defined in the gce
> > > > > > > > > header
> > > > > > > > > + include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h of each
> > > > > > > > > chips.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Missing any info here about when this should be used,
> > > > > > > > hint -
> > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > in the commit message.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-
> > > > > > > > > arrayi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why is the ID used by the CMDQ service not fixed for each
> > > > > > > > SoC?
>
> Did I misunderstand the ID here?
> I thought we were talking about event IDs, but it looks like we are
> talking about mbox IDs.
We were talking about the event IDs FWIW.
Just send a new version with some actual explanations added (as we
discussed earlier on this thread) and we should be good here I think.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists