[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb5dbffc-98d7-41e9-8a08-774d1f575b29@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:08:47 -0300
From: Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, "T.J. Mercier"
<tjmercier@...gle.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Do not build debugfs related code when
!CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
Hi Tvrtko,
On 4/1/24 10:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2024 13:45, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 01.04.24 um 14:39 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
>>>
>>> On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...lia.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations
>>>>> which are
>>>>> only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled
>>>>> in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save
>>>>> some text
>>>>> and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I
>>> mean? drm-misc-next?
>>
>> That should go through drm-misc-next.
>>
>> And feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König
>> <christian.koenig@....com> as well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Maarten if I got it right you are handling the next drm-misc-next pull -
> could you merge this one please?
Applied to drm-misc/drm-misc-next!
Best Regards,
- Maíra
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists