| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <97189d64-0db1-4663-8a2e-c1a7c06a241c@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:55:48 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: david@...nlining.org
Cc: airlied@...il.com, conor+dt@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
mripard@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org, sam@...nborg.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: Add driver for EDO RM69380 OLED panel
Le 15/04/2024 à 18:10, David Wronek a écrit :
> Add support for the 2560x1600@...z OLED panel by EDO bundled with a
> Raydium RM69380 controller, as found on the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad Pro 2021.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wronek <david-vu3DzTD92ROXwddmVfQv5g@...lic.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 14 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-raydium-rm69380.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 381 insertions(+)
>
..
> +static int rm69380_on(struct rm69380_panel *ctx)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi[0];
> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dsi->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> + if (ctx->dsi[1])
> + ctx->dsi[1]->mode_flags |= MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> +
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xfe, 0xd4);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x00, 0x80);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xfe, 0xd0);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x48, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xfe, 0x26);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x75, 0x3f);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x1d, 0x1a);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xfe, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x53, 0x28);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0xc2, 0x08);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x35, 0x00);
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, 0x51, 0x07, 0xff);
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + msleep(20);
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + msleep(36);
36 and 35 below are un-usual values for msleep.
Why 2 different values?
Would using a #define for this(these) value(s) make sense here?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rm69380_off(struct rm69380_panel *ctx)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi[0];
> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dsi->mode_flags &= ~MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> + if (ctx->dsi[1])
> + ctx->dsi[1]->mode_flags &= ~MIPI_DSI_MODE_LPM;
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + msleep(35);
(here)
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + msleep(20);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
> +static int rm69380_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_host *dsi_sec_host;
> + struct rm69380_panel *ctx;
> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> + struct device_node *dsi_sec;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx->supplies[0].supply = "vddio";
> + ctx->supplies[1].supply = "avdd";
> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->supplies),
> + ctx->supplies);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get regulators\n");
> +
> + ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio),
> + "Failed to get reset-gpios\n");
> +
> + dsi_sec = of_graph_get_remote_node(dsi->dev.of_node, 1, -1);
> +
> + if (dsi_sec) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Using Dual-DSI\n");
This should be after de 'info' variable below, so...
> +
> + const struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { "RM69380", 0,
> + dsi_sec };
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Found second DSI `%s`\n", dsi_sec->name);
.. maybe merge the 2 messages into something like:
dev_dbg(dev, "Using Dual-DSI: found `%s`\n", dsi_sec->name);
> +
> + dsi_sec_host = of_find_mipi_dsi_host_by_node(dsi_sec);
> + of_node_put(dsi_sec);
> + if (!dsi_sec_host) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER,
> + "Cannot get secondary DSI host\n");
> + }
> +
Nit: unneeded { }
> + ctx->dsi[1] =
> + mipi_dsi_device_register_full(dsi_sec_host, &info);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->dsi[1])) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->dsi[1]),
> + "Cannot get secondary DSI node\n");
> + }
Nit: unneeded { }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Second DSI name `%s`\n", ctx->dsi[1]->name);
> + mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(ctx->dsi[1], ctx);
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Using Single-DSI\n");
> + }
> +
> + ctx->dsi[0] = dsi;
> + mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, ctx);
> +
> + drm_panel_init(&ctx->panel, dev, &rm69380_panel_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
> + ctx->panel.prepare_prev_first = true;
> +
> + ctx->panel.backlight = rm69380_create_backlight(dsi);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->panel.backlight))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->panel.backlight),
> + "Failed to create backlight\n");
> +
> + drm_panel_add(&ctx->panel);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->dsi); i++) {
> + if (!ctx->dsi[i])
> + continue;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&ctx->dsi[i]->dev, "Binding DSI %d\n", i);
> +
> + ctx->dsi[i]->lanes = 4;
> + ctx->dsi[i]->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> + ctx->dsi[i]->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST |
> + MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS;
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_attach(ctx->dsi[i]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + drm_panel_remove(&ctx->panel);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to attach to DSI%d\n", i);
The error handling looks incomplete.
Previous mipi_dsi_attach() should be undone by a mipi_dsi_detach() as
done in the remove function.
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists