linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: correct VIB_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zh24eN9ZMZ6QhzeZ@google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:30:00 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com, kernel@...cinc.com,
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: correct VIB_MAX_LEVELS
 calculation

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:21:16PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 15:36, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
> <devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
> >
> > The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
> > off-by-one-step. Correct it.
> 
> ... while we are at it also add a define for the step size instead of
> using the magic value.

I adjusted the patch description as Dmitry suggested, and applied this
patch. Please address Konrad's feedback on the other 2 and I will apply
the rest.

Thank you.

-- 
Dmitry