lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:08:28 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
 Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>, 
 Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix version format string

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:52:48 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> The version format string in the AXI SPI Engine driver was probably
> intended to print the version number in the same format as the DT
> compatible string (e.g. 1.00.a). However, the version just uses
> semantic versioning so formatting the patch number as a character
> is not correct and would result in printing control characters for
> patch numbers less than 32.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: axi-spi-engine: fix version format string
      commit: 0064db9ce4aa7cc794e6f4aed60dee0f94fc9bcf

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ