[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhzpiWFCSvWWTqxx@bogus>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:47:05 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
james.morse@....com, jhugo@...eaurora.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
john.garry@...wei.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
pierre.gondois@....com, tiantao6@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: cacheinfo: remove the useless parameter
(node) of ci_leaf_init()
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:58:24AM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> The implementation of the ci_leaf_init() function body and the caller
> do not use the input parameter (struct device_node *node), so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 6a24915145c9 ("Revert "riscv: Set more data to cacheinfo"")
Not sure if this can be tagged as fix, but I leave that to RISC-V maintainers.
With the comment in PATCH 2/3 fixed based on your experiment, feel free
to add to the whole series,
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists