[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00ecb45910f795c7b4af02c7aaae0caa29871821.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:03:05 +0000
From: Peter Wang (王信友) <peter.wang@...iatek.com>
To: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>, "martin.petersen@...cle.com"
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "chu.stanley@...il.com"
<chu.stanley@...il.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "lgirdwood@...il.com"
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Stanley Chu (朱原陞) <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove useless
mediatek,ufs-support-va09 property
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 09:53 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Remove checking the mediatek,ufs-support-va09 property to decide
> whether to try to support the VA09 regulator handling and change
> the ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl() function to make it call
> devm_regulator_get_optional(): if the regulator is present, then
> we set the UFS_MTK_CAP_VA09_PWR_CTRL, effectively enabling the
> handling of the VA09 regulator based on that.
>
> Also, make sure to pass the return value of the call to
> devm_regulator_get_optional() to the probe function, so that
> if it returns a probe deferral, the appropriate action will be
> taken.
>
> While at it, remove the error print (disguised as info...) when
> the va09 regulator was not found.
>
> Fixes: ac8c2459091c ("scsi: ufs-mediatek: Decouple features from
> platform bindings")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> ----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-
> mediatek.c
> index 0b0c923b1d7b..e4643ac49033 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> @@ -622,27 +622,38 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_boost_crypt(struct
> ufs_hba *hba)
> return;
> }
>
> -static void ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +static int ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> struct ufs_mtk_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> + int ret;
>
> - host->reg_va09 = regulator_get(hba->dev, "va09");
> - if (IS_ERR(host->reg_va09))
> - dev_info(hba->dev, "failed to get va09");
> - else
> - host->caps |= UFS_MTK_CAP_VA09_PWR_CTRL;
> + host->reg_va09 = devm_regulator_get_optional(hba->dev, "va09");
>
Hi Angelo,
Mediatek may have pmic va09 but is not used by ufs.
The real va09 use module will have abnormal behavior if ufs control his
power.
Thanks.
Peter
> + if (IS_ERR(host->reg_va09)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(host->reg_va09);
> +
> + /* Return an error only if this is a deferral */
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + host->caps |= UFS_MTK_CAP_VA09_PWR_CTRL;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static void ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +static int ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> struct ufs_mtk_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> struct device_node *np = hba->dev->of_node;
> + int ret;
>
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mediatek,ufs-boost-crypt"))
> ufs_mtk_init_boost_crypt(hba);
>
> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mediatek,ufs-support-va09"))
> - ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl(hba);
> + ret = ufs_mtk_init_va09_pwr_ctrl(hba);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mediatek,ufs-disable-ah8"))
> host->caps |= UFS_MTK_CAP_DISABLE_AH8;
> @@ -663,6 +674,7 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
> host->caps |= UFS_MTK_CAP_RTFF_MTCMOS;
>
> dev_info(hba->dev, "caps: 0x%x", host->caps);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void ufs_mtk_scale_perf(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
> @@ -985,7 +997,9 @@ static int ufs_mtk_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> }
>
> /* Initialize host capability */
> - ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(hba);
> + err = ufs_mtk_init_host_caps(hba);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
>
> ufs_mtk_init_mcq_irq(hba);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists