linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] caam: init-clk based on caam-page0-access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <AM9PR04MB86042D682CC2E411826020A595092@AM9PR04MB8604.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:29:56 +0000
From: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>
To: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>, Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
	Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>, "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au"
	<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Francesco
 Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] caam: init-clk based on caam-page0-access



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 6:20 PM
> To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>; Gaurav Jain
> <gaurav.jain@....com>; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>;
> herbert@...dor.apana.org.au; davem@...emloft.net; Iuliana Prodan
> <iuliana.prodan@....com>; linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; Francesco Dolcini
> <francesco@...cini.it>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] caam: init-clk based on caam-page0-access
> 
> On 4/10/2024 11:00 AM, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > CAAM clock initialization to be done based on, soc specific info
> > stored in struct caam_imx_data:
> > - caam-page0-access flag
> > - num_clks
> >
> [...]
> > +static const struct caam_imx_data caam_imx8ulp_data = {
> > +	.page0_access = false,
> > +	.clks = NULL,
> > +	.num_clks = 0,
> > +};
> Not needed, an empty static struct would do.
Accepted.
Will add this as part of separate patch, requested below.

> 
> >  static const struct soc_device_attribute caam_imx_soc_table[] = {
> >  	{ .soc_id = "i.MX6UL", .data = &caam_imx6ul_data },
> >  	{ .soc_id = "i.MX6*",  .data = &caam_imx6_data },
> >  	{ .soc_id = "i.MX7*",  .data = &caam_imx7_data },
> >  	{ .soc_id = "i.MX8M*", .data = &caam_imx7_data },
> > +	{ .soc_id = "i.MX8ULP", .data = &caam_imx8ulp_data },
> >  	{ .soc_id = "VF*",     .data = &caam_vf610_data },
> >  	{ .family = "Freescale i.MX" },
> >  	{ /* sentinel */ }
> As Francesco pointed out in v1, this change is not related.
> 
> Ideally, adding support for i.MX8ULP SoC should be done in a separate patch,
> explaining a bit the particularities - similar to the commit message here:
> https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-
> imx/commit/d420f224ee02c164f6bdb3c8bbb5ec5827eaba37

Will create a separate patch for this change.

> 
> > @@ -889,7 +902,15 @@ static int caam_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> >  		reg_access = !ctrlpriv->optee_en;
> >
> > -		if (!imx_soc_match->data) {
> > +		if (imx_soc_match->data) {
> > +			imx_soc_data = imx_soc_match->data;
> > +			reg_access = reg_access && imx_soc_data-
> >page0_access;
> > +			/*
> > +			 * CAAM clocks cannot be controlled from kernel.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (!imx_soc_data->num_clks)
> > +				goto iomap_ctrl;
> > +		} else {
> >  			dev_err(dev, "No clock data provided for i.MX SoC");
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> >  		}
> if/else could be avoided, making code simpler:
> 
> 	if (!imx_soc_match->data) {
> 		dev_err(dev, "No clock data provided for i.MX SoC");
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}
> 
> 	imx_soc_data = imx_soc_match->data;
> 	reg_access = reg_access && imx_soc_data->page0_access;
> 	/* CAAM clocks cannot be controlled from kernel. */
> 	if (!imx_soc_data->num_clks)
> 		goto iomap_ctrl;
> 
[Accepted]

> Regards,
> Horia