linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in __ep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:57:34 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
 syzbot <syzbot+045b454ab35fd82a35fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in
 __ep_remove

On 4/15/24 15:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This isn't related to io_uring at all, not sure why syzbot has this idea
> that anything that involves task_work is iouring.

The repro does send an IORING_OP_READ, but I haven't looked deeper
to say if it's anything meaningful.


> #syz set subsystems: fs
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov