[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d019fca3-0dc5-4569-847f-13800519fdc1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:57:34 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
syzbot <syzbot+045b454ab35fd82a35fb@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] [io-uring?] general protection fault in
__ep_remove
On 4/15/24 15:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This isn't related to io_uring at all, not sure why syzbot has this idea
> that anything that involves task_work is iouring.
The repro does send an IORING_OP_READ, but I haven't looked deeper
to say if it's anything meaningful.
> #syz set subsystems: fs
>
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists