[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zh1AwtnewmweX3zr@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:59:14 +0800
From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
To: "Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@....com>
Cc: "rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
"Petkov, Borislav" <Borislav.Petkov@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Huang, Shimmer" <Shimmer.Huang@....com>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
"Meng, Li (Jassmine)" <Li.Meng@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/8] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Bail out if
min/max/nominal_freq is 0
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:03:25AM +0800, Yuan, Perry wrote:
> The amd-pstate driver cannot work when the min_freq, nominal_freq or
> the max_freq is zero. When this happens it is prudent to error out
> early on rather than waiting failing at the time of the governor
> initialization.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
> Tested-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 132330b4942f..6708c436e1a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -839,9 +839,11 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> nominal_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq);
> lowest_nonlinear_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq);
>
> - if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> - dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) value is incorrect\n",
> - min_freq, max_freq);
> + if (min_freq <= 0 || max_freq <= 0 ||
> + nominal_freq <= 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) or nominal_freq (%d) value is incorrect\n",
> + min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq);
I suggest that we add one comment to remind that should be the error of
ACPI table or BIOS.
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto free_cpudata1;
> }
> @@ -1299,9 +1301,11 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> max_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->max_freq);
> nominal_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_freq);
> lowest_nonlinear_freq = READ_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq);
> - if (min_freq < 0 || max_freq < 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> - dev_err(dev, "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) value is incorrect\n",
> - min_freq, max_freq);
> + if (min_freq <= 0 || max_freq <= 0 ||
> + nominal_freq <= 0 || min_freq > max_freq) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "min_freq(%d) or max_freq(%d) or nominal_freq(%d) value is incorrect\n",
> + min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq);
The same with above.
With that fixed, patch is Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Thanks,
Ray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists