[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xznpzlnjcf3goexunm6azwercgwz7ikgum3i4gpdyxwykb4e4l@ascd3uztphq3>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 18:09:03 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: bfoster@...hat.com, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix format specifier in validate_bset_keys()
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 08:16:02AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> When building for 32-bit platforms, for which size_t is 'unsigned int',
> there is a warning from a format string in validate_bset_keys():
>
> fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c: In function 'validate_bset_keys':
> fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:891:34: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 12 has type 'unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
> 891 | "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %lu)", k->u64s,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:603:32: note: in definition of macro 'btree_err'
> 603 | msg, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~
> fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:887:21: note: in expansion of macro 'btree_err_on'
> 887 | if (btree_err_on(!bkeyp_u64s_valid(&b->format, k),
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/bcachefs/btree_io.c:891:64: note: format string is defined here
> 891 | "bad k->u64s %u (min %u max %lu)", k->u64s,
> | ~~^
> | |
> | long unsigned int
> | %u
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> BKEY_U64s is size_t so the entire expression is promoted to size_t. Use
> the '%zu' specifier so that there is no warning regardless of the width
> of size_t.
>
> Fixes: 031ad9e7dbd1 ("bcachefs: Check for packed bkeys that are too big")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404130747.wH6Dd23p-lkp@intel.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404131536.HdAMBOVc-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Thanks, applied
Powered by blists - more mailing lists